An author colleague
said something today to spark this blog post. I am in the middle of planning a
blog tour at the moment, but this comment really got into my brain, and
wouldn’t let go, so I had to leave the blog tour planning and let the
fingertips pound the keyboard to get it out of my system.
My friend has recently
had a piece of work published, but when she told me about it she qualified her
statement as follows -
‘At least I can say now I have had something
published that isn’t self-published.’
Her statement got me
thinking about the poor rap that self-publishing has. To link this back to my
planning for the blog tour, I have researched literally hundreds of bloggers
over the past few weeks, and I wish I had kept some statistics, because the
overwhelming majority state in their policies that they won’t review
self-published authors.
Most are also quite
vocal about the reasons why - the generally poor standard of self-published
work puts readers and bloggers off, and they don’t want to waste their precious
time. And I can’t blame them. I have read a lot of such work over the past few
years, and although I am self-published myself, I think I would be almost
inclined to not want to review self -pubs either, unless they could convince me
that they had been professionally edited.
It is a shame really,
because many self-published authors do take pride in their work and give it the
care and attention it needs, even if it means waiting many more months to get
their work out there. When a self-publishing author takes the time to edit,
prepare and choose their publisher wisely, it can be very difficult to tell a
self-pub from a traditionally published book.
I read a quote earlier
this year by author Adrienne
Thompson - “Being self-published makes me no less ‘published’ than the
authors who are with publishing companies.” The dictionary defines to ‘publish’
as to issue printed or textual material for sale or distribution to the public.
It means the same thing whether an author does it themselves or whether a large
company does it for you. The end result is a paper or publication made available
to the public.
The final thought my
friend’s comment left me with was this - society generally applauds people who
do things their way - think of the famous Sinatra song - ‘I did it my way.’ We
encourage the artist and even the writer to develop their own style, but when
it comes to publishing it, there is only one way deemed to be the authentic
way. I think it comes from the idea that a person’s work has little value
unless someone else recognises it and tells the world about it.
What can
self-published authors do to turn thinking around? Continue to strive to raise
the bar on the standard of self-published work. Don’t be hasty to see your book
in the public arena. Take time to have it edited. Be willing to take criticism
on board and consider it before rejecting it out of hand. Hopefully in time,
with patience and perseverance, self-pubs will be able to turn public opinion
around, and self-publishing will be seen to be the move of a courageous author,
rather than a desperate act by an untalented ‘wanna-be’.